Last week, writing for The Intercept, Jeremy Scahill and Margot Williams exposed the surveillance state for what it is: an unconstitutional, extra-legal apparatus designed to manifest total awareness through covert monitoring of targets' cellular device activity and geolocation. A whistleblower provided the journalists with documents showing an extensive array of technologies utilized by federal and local authorities for intercepting electromagnetic data.
Of special interest to me are the DRT boxes as they are called, digital receivers capable of mimicking cell towers that capture thousands of targets' data. They are called cell-site simulators and there's been a flurry of attention and activity over the issue this past year. Background on the DRT boxes and the issues they present can be found here and here. Interestingly, in March 2015 a New York State Supreme Court ruling by Erie County Judge Patrick NeMoyer found the FBI and the Erie County Sheriff's Office at fault for failing the disclose material information about the use of the cell-site simulator technology under a Freedom of Information Act suit. That ruling can be read here. Apparently, the decision has been appealed and the NY ACLU is still waiting for the documents to be disclosed.
While it may seem blasé to remark about the fact that we live in some overarching surveillance state, the balance of our right to privacy to completely tipped in favor of the procurers of these invasive technologies. It fundamentally strips you of any right to privacy when these devices are used. Locally, the FBI routinely flies planes with these technologies. The Department of Homeland Security also operates surveillance planes and helicopters locally, both doubtless outfitted with similar technologies. Most importantly, it's the fact that almost nobody knows about these issues, much less cares. It's the apathy that surrounds us that is most astonishing. Perhaps it's the level of powerlessness people feel. People rarely look up to notice anything - the sky, the surveillance, the weird weather. There's the overriding contention that everything is normal, everything has always been this way, but this couldn't be further from the truth. We live in strange times.
The level of discourse and understanding of almost anything is so low it's nearly impossible to talk about a subject like this in polite company. Why? Because people see no value is discussing subjects like this. There's such an immediate wall built up surrounding any discourse that requires critical thought, action, or facing uncomfortable facts. We live in a society that has engineered itself to find no value in facing reality. Maybe because it's so fucking twisted at this point, I don't know. Regardless, when I look around and assess the level of awareness people have about what's happening around them, sometimes I feel like I'm swimming in a sea of jellyfish. They just want to go with the flow, blend in and stick with the herd. Well, not me. I won't be led to slaughter all because there's been some weird expectation placed on me that truth has no value and nothing is important. I prefer to live a life defined by a pursuit of truth rather than cowardice.
FBI Surveillance Plane
DHS Surveillance Plane, N839SA
DHS Surveillance Plane Circling over Lackawanna ISIS man's house, July 2015.
In what will be a series of posts dedicated to detailing a number of experiences with what can only be described as "UFO's", this is the second event I have photographic documentation of that is both inexplicable and perplexing. Altogether, before these photos were taken, I had witnessed three things that would fall into the category of UFO's. The first was a black, oddly shaped craft swiftly crossing the sky detailed in a previous post. At around the same point in time, perhaps that same day, I witnessed a slow pulsating, extremely bright light high in the sky during the day. I was identifying a plane through binoculars when far above the plane a light came into view, growing in intensity and then dissipating, in equal intervals of about three seconds. The light was extremely bright and round. It appeared about five times and then I couldn't see it anymore. This was the first time I really started to question what the hell I was seeing, and I was a UFO skeptic so the whole idea of seeing them wasn't even on my radar, so to speak. Later that day, I saw with my naked eye another bright silver light appear and make a quick L-shaped zip high in the sky and then disappear. These were the first three things that made me realize there was a lot going on above our heads.
The following pictures document an event from July 15, 2015. In a previous post, you can find many pictures from that day that show an intense chemtrail campaign, culminating in perhaps one of the most bizarre occurrences I've seen in the sky, a chemtrail mass stretching straight across the entire sky above the city of Buffalo. This mass was an accumulation of particulates already in the sky, not one trail sprayed by a plane. It was as if this thing appeared because it was activated somehow, or perhaps it just materialized due to temperature conditions, but nonetheless it was incredibly bizarre.
Upon analysis of the photos in recent months, I have discovered silver orbs floating near the trail that I did not see with my naked eye at the time because not only was I not looking for them, but I was also completely astounded by the appearance of this trail stretching from one side of the sky to the other.
Without further ado, here the photos. All photos taken at 18:03 and 18:05 EST from the Erie Basin Observatory in Buffalo, NY. The first photo is looking almost directly west, the second directly overhead, and the third directly east. Also included are some zoomed in screen shots of the original photos. The photos looking almost directly into sun show a number of what could be orbs, or some sort of lens flare (which appears in pictures with sun). Given the orbs appearing in the other photos, it's hard to say.
I've been sitting on these photos for a while for various reasons. As soon as I started documenting the geoengineering activities laying waste to the skies, anomalous objects started appearing that I had trouble comprehending. Pulsating lights, silver orbs floating in sky, appearing and disappearing, and this object, which I still cannot identify. A friend of a friend also saw the same thing about a mile away from my location. Drone? I don't know. Never seen a shapeshifting drone before. The object was completely silent unlike a noisy drone. It was pitch black and moved swiftly, horizontally. I was taking pictures of the sky when the object emerged into view from behind a tree. All photos taken at 20:25 EST from Elmwood and Lafayette Avenue with zoomed in screen shots following original photos. Notice the change in shape of object from first appearance to later photos. More photo and video documentation of other sightings is forthcoming.
For all those who think everything is perfectly explainable and they've got it all figured out, watch Dr. Steven Greer expose the deep state shadow government for what it is: a complex network of highly classified information and agents operating under the guise of a transnational security apparatus that seeks to control the truth about a wide array of issues directly affecting each and every one of us in innumerable ways. The history of world events since at least World War II has been obscured by the manipulations of this group, MAJIC, also referred to as Majestic. In the following presentation, four hours in length, Greer exposes this group as a sinister, all-powerful cabal that manufactures a false reality in the pursuit to maintain full control over perceptions of history and nothing less than the destiny of humankind. It is our task to shed light on the fact that reality is constantly obscured and controlled by this clique whose object is the seeming destruction of consciousness and free will.
From Veterans Today, this article provides an analysis of photographic and seismographic evidence indicating that the explosion that occurred in Tianjin, China was most likely a nuclear event.
Veterans Today published almost twenty in depth articles throughout 2014 and 2015 providing an analysis of evidence suggesting the WTC bombings in NYC on 9/11 were also nuclear events. Considering the miraculous way those buildings fell, this explanation seems to be the most plausible. The full list of published articles can be seen here: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/22/911-fraud-official-time-of-death-call-it/
Posted by Ian Greenhalgh, here's the abbreviated Tianjin report without appendices:
This was no chemical fire, this was China's 9-11.
by Ian Greenhalgh, Britain with Jeff Smith, USA
Two weeks ago a devastating explosion took place in the port city of Tianjin, China. Official reports claimed a chemical storage facility had caught fire and exploded. Mobile phone footage taken by residents showed an enormous blast and fireball.
Within days, aerial photos revealed the stunning extent of the damage. A steaming black crater marks ground zero, while the apocalyptic surrounding landscape is charred and flattened. Rows of burnt-out cars and twisted shipping containers stretch into the distance on all sides.
The extent of the devastation is such that it must have been a very big bang indeed.
The total burned area spans 20,000 square meters and continues to be dangerous—more explosions were reported by Chinese authorities on the 15th of August. Residents within a 3-mile radius have been relocated; at least 85 victims of the accident have been reported dead.
We were immediately suspicious, such huge explosions have to be viewed with suspicion these days when tactical nuclear weapons can and are used with alarming frequency – 9-11, The Khobar Towers, the Haiti Earthquake and most recently, air dropped on Yemen.
Massive devastation over a wide area.
The mobile phone as radiation detector
The key clue that allowed us to identify the use of a nuke in Yemen was the presence of scintillating pixels – white dots that flashed on and off briefly in the mobile phone videos of the explosion. The CCD imaging sensor within the camera phone is being struck by radiation thus causing a pixel to overload and appear white; in this way a mobile phone can serve double duty as a crude but effective radiation detector.
When the Tianjin blast occurred I immediately looked at the mobile phone footage of the blast and tried to find scintillating pixels; I couldn’t find any, but the huge white hot fireball and sheer size of the blast effect apparent in the footage (shaken buildings, breaking windows etc.) certainly didn’t feel like a conventional explosion to my relatively untrained eyes.
It was actually VT Contributor and expert on all things nuclear, Jeff Smith who taught us about scintillating pixels and the use of a mobile phone camera to detect radiation; therefore I consulted him about the lack of scintillation in the Tianjin footage:
Scintillation is based on the distance from the blast. The farther you get away from the blast the less neutron exposure you get. CCD Cameras will detect scintillation but only at high levels. They are not sensitive to far field radiation patterns. All CCD cameras were too far away to be sensitive enough to show scintillation properly.
So you have to look at the white out in the centre of the photo. This is where the brightness is so great that it overloads the ccd pickup chip causing a clipping effect. The fact that the fireball was whited out or clipped indicates that the colour temperature was over 4,000 degrees C. Only achievable in a nuclear blast. The cameras auto gain circuit clips the video level for being too bright so you get a white out on the screen.
The fireball with white hot centre.
No scintillation but a clear piece of evidence indicating a nuclear explosion in the form of the huge white fireball – once again, mobile phone footage proves useful in deciphering the truth.
The parking lots full of toasted cars
As reports and images became available, we studied them carefully for evidence of the use of a nuclear weapon and sadly, it was not long before we found it – the first big clue coming with the pictures of the thousands of toasted cars that looked eerily like those seen on 9-11.
Thousands of burnt out Volkswagen Beetles close to ground zero in Tianjin.
While a layman like myself can recognise the overall similarity, it takes an expert to fully analyse the evidence contained in the pictures; luckily, at VT we have such an expert in the erstwhile Jeff Smith who provided the following analysis:
Normal people are not trained in what to look at so they simply ignore the obvious. However, once you see enough explosions like this you begin to spot the artefacts in the photos real fast. Unfortunately all of these people that know this stuff usually work for the government. Just like I did.
The big clue is in the ash produced and the exploding radiators on the cars. They show the radiation and the blast patterns the best. All melted rubber, glass, and aluminium but no melted steel? This tells you it is from radiation and not from a gasoline fire. Temps between 1500 degrees C for melting aluminium and less than 3,000 degrees C for melting steel. Everything organic ashes below 450 degrees C.
This had a plasma fireball that was over 4,000C! Only a nuke can do that. The clue is in the white ash leftover from the thermal blast.
White ash caused by the thermal blast covered everything near ground zero.
A. The fuel tanks did not explode.
B. The rubber tires were ashed not burned see the white powder residue around the cars.
C. The radiators are all gone; indicating Freon explosions.
D. All the glass is ashed or melted; also the the glass was blown out not in.
E. All new white cars show extreme effects from very high temperature heating. The paint is badly damaged due to a very high oxidation rate effect.
F. Silicone rubber tires ash at 500 degrees centigrade. Glass ashes at 1500 degrees centigrade. Gasoline at 250 degrees centigrade. Tires melted but no gas tank explosions; just like on 911.
G. Yellow Volkswagen Beetle cars untouched due to location indicating radiation shielding from a nearby building. Just like on 911….
H. Finally and most important is all of the nano particle sized ash on the ground everywhere. Purple haze in photo is an indication of toxic levels of the gases fluorine, chlorine and sodium.
Conclusion; The damage to the cars was produced by neutron radiation damage and not by conventional explosives or a fuel-air explosion. The distance from ground zero is too great for a standard blast to melt the glass and tires. Also the cars fuel tanks were shielded from the heat of the ignition source.
Purple haze indicating the presence of toxic levels of the gases fluorine, chlorine and sodium.
So there you have it, the ‘smoking gun’ evidence of a nuke is to be found among the smoking wreckage of those incinerated cars. However, the pictures of burnt out cars contain more evidence to be analysed before we move on to the other evidence.
The melted radiators and the role of Freon
As you can clearly see in the picture below, the radiator of this vehicle has been completely destroyed, incinerated into ash. Only the steel top plate remains, all of the aluminium and copper of the radiator core have been turned into a pile of ash. Once again, our resident expert Jeff Smith was able to provide insight and analysis of what we are seeing:
Incinerated remains of a car close to ground zero.
All of the radiators exploded from Freon decomposition into methane, deuterium fluoride, and phosgene gas; thus causing engine fires – note the melted hoods and also how overpressure from an air burst explosion has compressed the hoods of the cars.
The copper-clad/aluminium automotive radiator is transparent to nuclear radiation. It acts as a black body hollow-ram neutron reflector and functions just exactly like its bigger brother the two staged Teller-Ulman H-bomb. What this means is if you put DT gas or 2HF (Freon) in a vacuum chamber such as a car radiator, you reduce its density thus it take less energy to either split it or fuse it when exposed to neutrons, Gamma-rays or even soft x-rays from a nearby nuclear explosion – if the blast is large enough or close enough.
This forms the basis of a micro nuclear explosive device, with ignition temperatures high enough to melt just about anything that comes in contact with it. The key is in the lower density of the gas making compression of it a lot easier. This explains all of the melted car air conditioning radiators and follow on fires. Also the lack of fallout.
Here you can actually see the radiators at the front of the cars are on fire but the rear of the cars are untouched.
See Appendix A.
The Crater at Ground Zero
Once again, Jeff Smith was able to provide detailed analyses of the available imagery of the blast crater at ground zero and the damage to the surrounding area. Jeff along with Jim stone and others stated that:
This was NOT an accident, the fracture pattern around the crater proves a to be a shallow sub ground burst. If it was a sub ground burst, then a small nuclear weapon is the biggest possibility because once a nuke has to push dirt, the blinding flash will not be seen. A slightly subsurface detonation would explain why camera sensors did not get strange artefacts. And if it was not a nuke, it was something else incredibly huge, but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air bombs will not leave craters. They also leave an oily carbide residue on everything.
Even my layman’s eye can immediately tell that the explosion that caused this level of devastation was far beyond a mere explosion of stored chemicals. Also, there were no storage buildings at ground zero, just some stacks of shipping containers. Also, it is obvious to me that immense heat was present – look at the gray-white ash everywhere. Jeff was able to explain what I was seeing in these disturbing images:
A little bit more of a detailed explanation: If the blast happened at ground level, almost all of the energy would go upwards and the blast would not have made a large deep crater, especially one large enough and deep enough to make that lake. If you look to the right hand side of the lake, you can see fracture patterns in the earth, which were caused by the earth being compressed sideways and not downwards. This would only be done with a sub surface blast. After the blast, the earth bounced back towards the centre of the lake, which opened up the cracks.
Look closely at the ground around the lake. Those who claimed it was not a nuke cited the fact that if it was, everything around the crater would be vaporized and wiped clean. Now that we have the real crater pic from the big blast, YEP, it matches that perfectly. Take a look at the containers laying in the lower left corner of this picture – they have no paint or colour, which means they had the surfaces incinerated by intense heat only a nuke or other super weapon would reach. If this was a carbide blast, they would be black or have their original colours to some degree, complete colour change to only gray proves this explosion was FREAKING HOT.
That type and size of blast crater will only happen if a massive bomb goes off a few feet underground, such as a tactical nuke in a drain pipe which leaves scant few alternative options. No chemical blast did that, PERIOD. The building that is still standing in the upper right hand side of the frame is a typical example of what is left after a nuclear test, concrete buildings seldom get levelled, but they do get gutted by nuclear blasts. Just look through pictures of the soviet nuclear tests and you will see this. Bottom line? The aftermath is completely consistent with a nuclear blast.
Even to the untrained eye, the imagery of the aftermath of this awful event cannot be mistaken as anything other than horriffic; when you also have expert testimony that explains the true nature of what you are seeing the imagery becomes even more shocking and disturbing. Destruction on this scale will become commonplace if the perpetrators are allowed to get away with this as it will signal to all parties possessed of tactical nuclear weapons that it is possible to put them to use without disclosure of that fact by the media. Perhaps more concerning is China’s silence on the nuclear aspect of this great crime – they are still sticking to their story of fire setting off explosions of stored chemicals. As we have shown, this story is about as credible as the one about hijacking airliners with boxcutters; given state control of the media in China, it might be a while before people learn the truth.
Identifying the type of weapon and Seismology of the event
Now we have established that a nuclear explosion took place, let us examine more closely the nature of that explosion. One important question is the delivery method – was it a strike by a cruise missile or was it a bomb hidden inside a shipping container? Or is there another answer to this question? The crater strongly indicates the explosion was sub-surface which appears to rule out the bomb having been smuggled into Tianjin in a shipping container. It does not rule out a cruise missile strike however – the ground in this area is very soft, alluvial deposits of soft silts and clays deposited over time by the nearby river. A cruise missile impacting this soft ground at over 500mph would surely penetrate to some depth; if a delayed action fuse was fitted to the warhead, this would create an shallow underground explosion. Jeff Smith provides further analysis:
Note the crater is about 400 feet wide as measured by comparison to the standard shipping container sizes of 40 feet. The crater is a complex crater with a cardioid shape indicating a very low altitude or surface contact blast. Side ways compression of the soil indicates some ground penetration. Penetration depth of ground is based on soil type and burst height. Horizontal crater size is roughly equal to ( for every 100 feet, 1 Kiloton in size) see charts. This would put the blast size depending on air burst altitude to be between 3 and 5 kilotons of explosive power.
Satellite image of Tianjin with overlay of blast radius.
See Appendix B.
If it was a low altitude air burst, ground coupling will be less showing a smaller Richter scale reading than usual. The only question is the fallout issue. Was there any and of what type. Since it rained after the blast most of the fallout went out to sea proven by the massive fish kill in the bay. The safety zone was set at 3 kilometres. This is a correct value for small tactical nuke fallout range. 1 KM per KT. The only other question was it a uranium weapon a plutonium based weapon or other i.e. a fusion weapon? Uranium cannot be traced very well but a PU based weapon can be traced down to the reactor that made it and the chemical separation process that was used. Firemen were shown carrying radiation and poisonous gas detectors.
Given the 3km evacuation zone we can assume an explosive yield of around 3 kilotons. A typical cruise missile nuclear warhead such as the Israeli ‘Popeye’ carries 6 kilograms of plutonium; using the rule of thumb of 1 kiloton yield per kilogram of plutonium, the size of the explosion correlates with the yield of a typical cruise missile warhead.
Jeff also noticed that a secondary blast took place; this is another indicator of the nuclear nature of this event, as Jeff explains:
Well it looks like there were two major blasts not just one. There are two sections of the video where the blast whites out the entire camera. This is the original neutron burst going off; everything else is a secondary or the atmosphere heating up and burning.
Note: The reaction caused, a sustained glowing in the sky which is a well known indicator of a nuclear explosion. Non-nuclear weapons do not provide a sustained “Sun-like” illumination because they do not have enough energy to ignite the oxygen and nitrogen in the atmosphere.
Another aspect that requires study is the seismology readings of the event.. Once again, Jeff provides some insight:
The first blast registered 2.3 on the Richter scale and the second 2.9. Eyewitnesses described what felt like a quake. USGS geophysicist John Bellini says seismographs detect man-made explosions in quarries all the time, but usually surface explosions are not detected very well because most of their energy dissipates upward into the air. The fact is that the Tianjin explosions registered a seismographic event that had as much energy as a small earthquake. One can reasonably conclude that unlike a surface explosion of chemicals, this kinetic energy released underground was caused by a powerful penetration of the surface.
In this article we have tried to provide a thorough but clear and concise analysis of the available evidence and show that it is clear that this was no simple fire in a chemical storage depot that resulted in an explosion but rather it was the detonation of a nuclear weapon of unknown type by an unknown party. We will examine the who and why in a follow-up article.
This is a very significant event that will undoubtedly prove to be of great importance in subsequent world events. In many ways, this is China’s 9-11.
Let us all hope that unlike 9-11, the Nuking of Tianjin does not become the cassus belli for a whole series of unjustified, brutal and bloody conflicts.
One thing is already very clearly illustrated by this tragic event – the gloves are most definitely off when it comes to the use of tactical nuclear weapons; we are living in an new nuclear age where a great number of countries possess the means to create and deploy tactical nukes and most worrying of all, these low yield weapons can be used and have already been used without fear of mutually assured destruction; the doctrine that prevented the Cold War from going nuclear. This makes the world a much more dangerous place and undoubtedly means we will see many more nuclear explosions in future.
There is an old Chinese curse – “may you live in interesting times”; these are certainly ‘interesting’ times for anyone who is paying attention to events in China.
Full Report - http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/25/confirmation-tianjin-was-nuked/
To add to the thesis that ongoing "geoengineering" projects are severely detrimental to our health and our ecosystem, a paper has been recently published naming aluminum as the toxin ruining bee colonies. Pesticides, GMO's, and other causes have been discussed, but a study of wild bee colonies all over the UK demonstrate high levels of aluminum, regardless of location or colony.
The Welsbach geoengineering patent names aluminum oxides as the number one material to be used for solar radiation management. Aluminum has been showing up in citizen water sample tests throughout the NATO countries where visible spraying operations have been witnessed. Aluminum is the number one component of coal fly ash, the material most likely used as an ingredient for geoengineering programs.
If the bees are dying, what is this airborne toxic madness doing to us?
Abstract: The causes of declines in bees and other pollinators remains an on-going debate. While recent attention has focussed upon pesticides, other environmental pollutants have largely been ignored. Aluminium is the most significant environmental contaminant of recent times and we speculated that it could be a factor in pollinator decline. Herein we have measured the content of aluminium in bumblebee pupae taken from naturally foraging colonies in the UK. Individual pupae were acid-digested in a microwave oven and their aluminium content determined using transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Pupae were heavily contaminated with aluminium giving values between 13.4 and 193.4 μg/g dry wt. and a mean (SD) value of 51.0 (33.0) μg/g dry wt. for the 72 pupae tested. Mean aluminium content was shown to be a significant negative predictor of average pupal weight in colonies. While no other statistically significant relationships were found relating aluminium to bee or colony health, the actual content of aluminium in pupae are extremely high and demonstrate significant exposure to aluminium. Bees rely heavily on cognitive function and aluminium is a known neurotoxin with links, for example, to Alzheimer’s disease in humans. The significant contamination of bumblebee pupae by aluminium raises the intriguing spectre of cognitive dysfunction playing a role in their population decline.
A study recently published in the open access journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health by J. Marvin Herndon asserts that the most likely culprit for the toxic, geoengineered skies we all witness is coal fly ash. Composed of heavy metals and other toxic elements, coal fly ash is the most probable mixture of ingredients in the daily, visible spray operations to "geoengineer" our earth's atmosphere.
Herndon's paper shows a relationship between the composition of air and water samples taken from San Diego and the chemical properties of coal fly ash from European power plants. What is discovered is a nearly identical chemical makeup, including elements such as aluminum, barium, and strontium, elements specifically named in geoengineering patents such as the Welsbach patent. The Welsbach patent uses aluminum to reflect the sun's radiation, what is called solar radiation management by the "geoengineers", but apparently these science wizzes never contemplated the secondary effects of spraying the earth's atmosphere with a heavy metal that lingers and floats around everywhere, such as heat trapping, tree die-offs, and bumble bee deaths.
If it is indeed true that they are spraying processed coal fly ash into our atmosphere, the health catastrophe lying dead ahead is enormous. On top of the toxic air, we have an atmosphere absolutely loaded with electromagnetic waves, a source of invisible yet highly disruptive pollution. Consult your phone's user manual so you know never to place it against your heart or to never let it touch your skin. But nevermind everything secondary, because at this point anything that doesn't stop this "geoengineering" seems secondary. If we don't get some answers and put an end to this madness, there's no telling what is going to happen next.
The following pictures depict an aerial campaign by two jets cruising at 43,000 feet leaving thick, resilient trails in their wake. The photos were taken from the waterfront of Buffalo, New York on Friday, July 24, 2015. Both jets appeared on FlightRadar24.com radar near the same location southeast of Alfred, New York. The sky was relatively blue this particular morning but by evening was a faded mass of jet exhaust byproducts, whatever that may consist of this week.
July, 15, 2015 13:40 EST. Looking west at Lake Erie near Lasalle Park.
14:21 EST. Two jets flying northwest laying visible, persistent trails.
14:23 EST. Jets appear on radar southeast of Alfred, NY.
14:34 EST. Trail persist and expand.
15:00 EST. Overlooking Canalside, in the sky immediately above the grain silos are the trails laid by unidentified jets.
These jets followed this same flight track until descending to under 30,000 feet at the cusp of Lake Superior. I didn't track them past there, but their landing zone should be available through the playback feature on FlightRadar24.com.
